Page 17 - 3.faith-ministry
P. 17

17


                        Chapter 2



                        The Church and Culture – The Development of Ministry Since Vatican II



                        i)     Blurring the lines - The sacred and the secular

                        The Church’s response to secular culture arises from the Second  Vatican Council,
                        through which the Church is said to drop its guard and to begin to come to terms with
                                                   23
                        secularism  and  modernity .    In  doing  so  a  counter-cultural 24  Church  begins  to
                        transform itself, engaging the ‘resources of the culture in pursuit of its own religious
                                                        25
                        mission’  (Whiteheads  1995:57) .  Hence  secular  social  sciences  are  incorporated
                        and  transformed  to  become  a  ‘doctrine  of  Christian  anthropology’  (McDonagh
                        2000:297). This is not simply ‘secular humanism in religious garb’, but a reassertion

                        of human dignity 26  that is grounded in the ‘image of Christ’ (CES 2005:41).   Vatican
                        II  therefore  represents  the  Church  coming  to  accept  the  subjective  turn  of
                        modernism. Specifically it is Christ himself who becomes the subject of the Church’s

                        engagement  and  mission  in  the  world  through  ‘his  presence  in  the  Church,  in  the
                        Sacraments, in the offices of its bishops, priests and people, in the hearts of all the

                        faithful,  in  secular  culture,  in  other  faiths,  in  all  humanity  and  in  history  itself’
                        (2005:36).



                        This convergence on culture 27  is marked by a return to the lived experience, by which

                        the Church positions itself and allows itself to be positioned by secular discourses,
                        simultaneously  absorbing  and  deflecting  cultural  influences  (Milbank  cited  in  Ward
                        2008:19).  Indeed  in  allowing  herself  to  be  ‘translated’  by  other  cultures  (CES


                        23
                          Von Balthasar asserts that Vatican II represents the Church relinquishing its security system that establishes
                        the transcendental realm (religious), over the physical realm (secular) (Cited in CES 2005:36).  On the Way to Life
                        states that this “defencelessness” is based upon the fact that Vatican II did not arise as a result of any overt threat
                        to the Church (36).
                        24
                          According to Rinere the Church prior to Vatican II is described as inward looking with no external mission. A
                        clear boundary exists between the clergy who distribute the sacraments, and the people who passively receive
                        them. (2003:68-71).
                        25
                          In Method in Ministry, the Whiteheads give three positions for the encounter between religion and culture. A)
                        Religion challenges culture. B) Religion is challenged by culture. C) Religion engages with and utilises cultural
                        resources.
                        26
                          Gaudium et Spes  reasserts man as “created to the image of God” (GS §12), with a dignity of mind (GS §15),
                        and moral conscience (GS §16).  It establishes a “reverence for the human person” (GS §27) that recognises
                        equality and social justice for all (GS §29).
                        27  Pete Ward refers to the “convergence on culture” in terms of how practical theology has become centred upon
                        culture so that “ideas about God” have become “connected and conditioned by historical and social realities”.
                        Doctrine and theological expression therefore become embodied and subjective within the lived experience.  It
                        becomes no longer sustainable for academic theologising on its own terms as it misses the point of the
                        experience of the community of faith (2008:46-50).
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22