Page 18 - 3.faith-ministry
P. 18

18


                        2005:61)  the  Church  acknowledges  the  differences  between  people,  encountering

                                                                                                      28
                        the other precisely as other (Congar cited in Howland Sanks 1989:107-108) . This
                        opens  up  a relational  model  of  Church  (Bishop’s  Conference 1998:6)  which  is

                        inseparable from human history that is both its ‘life situation and its cross’ (O’Meara:
                        1999:82-89). Significantly as the secular order becomes progressively more complex

                        and  disassembled  within  post-modernism,  the  positive  benefits  translated  from
                        culture  may  be  accompanied  by  more  corrosive  elements.  Therefore  when  Byron

                        suggests that we should apply ‘best practice from business to our parishes’ (2010:40-
                        44), and Lyall proposes a need for more professionalism in pastoral care (2000:317)
                        is this a proper concern for improved efficiency and quality in the service the Church

                        provides?  Or  rather  is  the  Church  being  drawn  into  a  performance  culture  that
                        focuses  on  ‘skills’  and  ‘outcomes’,  rather  than  meeting  the  spiritual  needs  of  its

                        members?  29  (Downey 2003:3-4).


                        Vatican II therefore makes the secular order not merely a conversation partner for the

                        Church, but also a place where Christ can and must be encountered. However it is
                        unable to fully resolve the tensions between these domains, and conflicting signals

                        emerge  with  regard  to  how  the  Church  understands  this  relationship.  Indeed  the
                        Church is  described simultaneously as ‘being separate from the world’, but  also in
                                                                30
                        ‘unity....with the world’ (Rinere 2003:77) . In the view of Howland Sanks this tension
                        arises because as the Church encounters other diverse secular and religious cultures

                        it has to come to terms with its own truth claims as they compete, and are critiqued
                        by other micro-narratives of meaning. The foundational problem for the Church shifts
                        becoming  not  a  question  of  its  irrefutable  truth,  but  rather  of  its  believability  in

                        comparison to these other narratives (1989:100-115).



                        ii)    Ecclesiological tensions within Vatican II
                        Through  Vatican  II  the  classical  paradigm  of  the  Church  as  hierarchical  institution

                        becomes supplemented by an alternative ecclesiology of the ‘People of God’ (LG §9-


                        28
                         Hence the Church is able to reach out not only to the common heritage of other Christians (Unitatis
                        Redintegrato), or those of other faiths (Nostra Aetate), but also the secular order (Gaudium et Spes).
                        29  Ballard & Pritchard also refer to the professionalization of culture and how it affects Church ministry by putting a
                        constant pressure upon the clergy to respond and perform (1996:113-116).
                        30
                          Rinere also makes the point that the separation between the Church and the world suggests religion is
                        somehow separate from everyday life, and she poses the question: “How can a Christian lead a unified and
                        integrated life if the Christian does not live in an integrated environment?” (2003:77-78).
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23