Page 8 - 3.faith-ministry
P. 8

8


                        Chapter 1



                        Understanding the Terrain - Post-modernism and Policing Culture



                        i)     The key features of post-modernism

                        In  identifying  the  significant  themes  of  contemporary  culture  it  is  wise  to  define  in
                        basic terms the cultural parameters that we seek to explore. In simple terms culture

                        here is to  be understood in its Western, post-industrialised setting. Specifically the
                        cultural terrain with which we are interested is that which is termed post-modernism.
                        Post-modernism and post-modernity are terms that are open to  wide interpretation

                        and it is beyond the scope of this work to analyse the different approaches to them in
                                  6
                        any depth .  In simple terms however post-modernism can be understood either as ‘a
                        successor epoch’, or a ‘critical corrective’ to modernism and its grand narratives of
                        ‘truth,  human  nature,  knowledge,  power,  self-hood  and  language’  (Graham
                        2000:107).  In  post-modernism  meaning  is  undermined  and  becomes  ‘fragmented,

                        and  regionalised,  with  micro-narratives  and  local  claims  to  knowledge’  emerging
                        (CES 2005:78). Hence the defining characteristic of post-modernism is a pessimistic 7

                        rejection of the inevitable progress proposed by the Enlightenment, in which intuition
                        replaces  rationality,  and  where  universal  concepts  of  truth  are  usurped  by  a
                                 8
                        relativism and pluralism that become defined within any particular community (Grenz
                        cited  in  Phan  2003:59).  This  is  compounded  by  a  significant  shift  from  external

                        objective sources of  authority to  those that  are personal, the so called  ‘turn to  the
                        subject’ of modernity (CES 2005:16-17).









                        6
                         Marie McCarthy posits that the post-modern era is demarked by a seismic shift in our consciousness that is
                        “marked primarily by the growing awareness of the relativity and particularity of every perspective and position.
                        No longer do we speak of universal principles and laws, valid for all times and places. Instead we look for the
                        particular historical, cultural, social and familial values that may have contributed to this particular set of principles
                        and  laws  being  useful  in  this  particular  set  of  circumstances”  (2000:194).  Elaine  Graham  contrasts  post-
                        modernism  and  post-modernity.  The  former  “denotes  the  cultural,  intellectual  and  aesthetic  dimensions  of  the
                        postmodern  age”.  The  latter  “indicates  the  sociological,  economic  and  political  contours  of  late  capitalism”
                        (2000:113).
                        7  A key feature of this pessimism involves the fracturing of the relationship of truth and trust, so that truth is no
                        longer transcendent but rather becomes a commodity within any particular context so that ‘what is truth’ is
                        replaced by ‘whose truth?’ (CES 2005:15)
                        8
                         Within his Bellahouston Park homily (16/09/10), during his Papal visit to the UK Pope Benedict XVI referred to a
                        “dictatorship of relativism” within contemporary culture “that threatens to obscure the unchanging truth about
                        man’s nature” (www.thepapalvisit.org.uk).
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13